The term “overfat” is now being used by scientists to define obese people and those who seemingly look normal-sized, but in fact are carrying excessive amounts of body fat within them. Manchester Community College resident James Clark tried to do some breakthrough research on how to eliminate these exuberant fat material. He thought about effective ways to alter the bodies’ composition and look at some of the more common metabolic issues of people being described as “overfat”.
Clark’s review has some scientists doing some experiments to see which of the many treatment program changes available are the best ones for overfat people. These overfat individuals are identified based on aggregated effect size of 66 population studies and around 160 studywise groups.
You might think that the test results are obvious, but it wasn’t so. It actually yielded two very different results. The end result and explanation was that in order to successfully change body compositions, an individual must incorporate a hypocaloric balance, or in simpler terms, a dietary restriction. That might be an obvious factor for some, but hear out what the surprising fact is. Though dietary restrictions are required to undergo a successful treatment for fat loss, its effectiveness isn’t a direct correlation of the changes in body composition. Furthermore, the caloric deficit doesn’t really affect the biomarkers seen in most metabolic issues.
What does this all say about dieting and losing fat? Simple. Those who go on long diets, crash diets or fad diets aren’t the most successful weight-losers as compared to other ways of losing body fat.
Studies have long stated that a good combination of exercise is helpful in losing weight and becoming a healthier individual. The term “overfat” may also be applied to individuals who are relatively in weight but possess little muscle. Here, we see that Clark’s conclusion has some telltale results:
Resistance training is shown to be more effective as opposed to endurance training. It has shown to have more promise than even resistance training and endurance training combined together. In particular, when resistance training has a progression program with these numbers- 2 to 3 sets, with each set having around 6 to 10 reps done in an intensity aspect of greater than 75% 1RM. The training itself has to have free-weight and whole body exercises to be effective at altering body compositions (or in short, losing excessive fat storage in the body), with ES numbers of .40, .30 and .47 for FFM, FM and BM in respective terms.
The results make sense, and it is totally in line with the general recommendation of health experts during the past few decades. Furthermore, Clark’s results show that resistance training in itself is better and more effective in eliminating low-density lipoproteins (with an ES equal to .60) and total cholesterol (with an ES equal to .85), and in the reduction of fasting insulin levels (with an ES equal to 3.5) as compared to endurance training, or endurance training combined with resistance training. The verdict is out- more isn’t really better. Devoting your time to resistance training rather than dividing it into resistance and endurance training is actually the better way to burning off that stubborn fat.
Before you go starting a fat-busting regimen of resistance training, hear this first. Despite the seemingly conclusive report of James Clark, it would be wise to take it with a grain of salt. The interventions on average focus on resistance training and dieting show that it’s the go-to regimen if you want to burn fat away, but assuming that you should only do a medium-intensity cardio each week would be a counter-productive aspect. Using this thinking to eat more may deliver different results. For example, if one goes on a 15 to 20 minute moderate jogging session three times per week, it’s safe to assume that they won’t be delaying the fat loss nor burn away muscle mass. The lack of the combined training effects under the meta-analysis environment can be due to the factors having naught to do with the consequences of moderate-intensity cardio exercises.
Let’s answer one baffling result that’s on everybody’s mind- why is resistance training singularly better than combined resistance and cardio training? The answer is hidden deep within the designs of the study. The combination training didn’t necessarily follow the rules that one must have a program of high-intensity, high-volume and progressive training workouts with free weights. Furthermore, there were some unmeasured factors such as some of the female participant’s
Capture this article, print it and pin it on your fridge or where it could be seen everyday if your SO is still unconvinced that resistance training is the path to take on the road to fat burning. Working with weights is the single most effective exercise an individual can get if they want to lose weight, not starvation or running the treadmill three times a week. Furthermore, based on Clark’s analysis and results, resistance training provides far more benefits when it comes to overall health and body composition. Where the study had complete information about the body composition and a sensible training regimen, resistance training proved to be more effective in losing weight. We can chalk it up as a statistical phenomenon in this case.
All in all, there’s a lesson to be gained other than the obvious statistic that resistance training is better than dieting or cardio training. Clark says in his research that there’s no relationship between induced health biomarkers or body composition responses with inducing changes in the energetic balance from the tested treatment program. The results mirror that of an accepted notion that each body composition isn’t necessarily a function of energy expenditure versus the intake of energy. It’s true that metabolic stress has a greater effect when used within HIIT and resistance training. Obviously, HIIT and resistance training prove to be far more effective than the steady state. James Clark is quick to state that the focus of the study is on producing a large amount of metabolic stress via resistance training or a high-intensity cardio training on safe levels instead of changing the balance of energy in people classified as overfat.
Donnelly, Joseph E., et al. The American journal of clinical nutrition 54.1 (1991): 56-61.
Cuff, Darcye J., et al. “Effective exercise modality to reduce insulin resistance in women with type 2 diabetes.” Diabetes care 26.11 (2003): 2977-2982.
Clark, James E. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 14.1 (2015): 31.